A Brief History of ‘’Bangladesh War of Independence”
["In
a simple term, we fought a war on virtues on the foundational trust on
secularism, socialism, justice for all, and Benglali nationalism. But
collectively we have failed to introduce the ideals we fought for. We need a
reintroduction of the ideals today."
- Nurul Mostafa Kamal Zafari, PMP, CPMS, SRMP]
The Bangladesh War of Independence or the Bangladesh
Liberation War refers to an armed conflict between West Pakistan (now Pakistan) and East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) that lasted for roughly nine
months in 1971. The war resulted in Bangladesh's independence from Pakistan.
Pakistan's partition from India in 1947 had arisen from
the 'two-nation' thesis that Muslims and Hindus in India were both 'nations'
whose people could not live together. Pakistan was the first modern-state
founded solely on the basis of religion, since although India had a Hindu
majority its population, with Muslims, Sikhs, Jains and Christians was
multi-religious and its constitution was secular. When East Bengal was included
in the partition, many thought this mistaken because of the cultural differences
between Bengal and the peoples of what became West Pakistan. When the West
tried to impose Urdu as the official language in the East, a
linguistic-cultural opposition movement began.
Bangladesh would be founded on the basis of cultural and
linguistic identity. Muslims, Hindus, Christians, Buddhists and animists,
united by a common language and a common culture, struggled for their freedom.
Few families were unaffected by the war. Most lost relatives. Bengali have been
conquered by others but have not had a history of aggression. They have traded,
written poetry, sung songs and have developed a rich cultural tradition of
which they are proud. However, denied equal rights with West Pakistan and the
right to form a government even though the largest number of seats in
Pakistan's Parliament were held by East Pakistani members, they bravely
asserted their right to self-determination. The atrocities committed by
Pakistani soldiers during this war are regarded by some as genocide.
>>Reasons for war
Years before the war:
During the Partition of India, Pakistan, as a country,
gained independence on August 14, 1947 following the end of British rule over
South Asian countries. The division was made based on religion. Pakistan was created out of Muslim majority territories in the West
and East, and India was created out of the vast Hindu majority regions in the center. The
Western zone was popularly (and for a period of time, also officially) called
West Pakistan and the Eastern zone (modern-day Bangladesh) was called East
Bengal and later, East Pakistan. The capital of Pakistan was established
in Karachi in West
Pakistan and then moved to Islamabad in 1958.
Economic exploitation:
West Pakistan (consisting of four provinces: Punjab,
Sindh, Balochistan and North-West Frontier Province) dominated the divided
country and received more money than the more populous East.
Between 1948 and 1960, East Pakistan's export earnings
had been 70 percent while it only received 25 percent of import earning. In
1948 (shortly after independence from the UK), East Pakistan had 11 textile
mills while West had 9. In 1971, the number of textile mills in the West had
grown to 150 while that in the East had only gone up to 26. A transfer of 2.6
billion dollars (in 1971 exchange rates) worth resources was also done over
time from East Pakistan to West Pakistan. Moreover it was felt that much of the
income generated by the east was primarily diverted towards fighting wars
in Kashmir.
Difference in religious
standpoints:
One of the key issue was the extent to which Islam was followed. West Pakistan with an
overwhelming 97 percent Muslim population was less liberal (in religious terms)
than East Pakistan which was at least 15 percent non-Muslim (mainly Hindus).
Bengalis' are proud of their common literary and cultural heritage in which
Muslim, Hindu and Christian writers are held in high esteem across the
religious divide. The difference was made further clear after Bangladeshi
independence, when Bangladesh was established as a secular country under the
name "People's Republic of Bangladesh" rather than as the Islamic
Republic of Bangladesh. This was in tribute to all those, Muslim and
non-Muslim, who had taken part in the independence struggle.
Other factors including
language:
Close ties existed between East Pakistan and West Bengal,
one of the Indian states bordering Bangladesh, as both were composed mostly of
Bengalis. West Pakistan viewed East Pakistani links with India unfavorably as
relations between India and Pakistan had been very poor since independence.
In 1948, Mohammad Ali Jinnah declared in Dhaka, capital
of East Pakistan, that "Urdu, and only Urdu," a language that was
only spoken in the West by Muhajirs and in the East by Biharis, would be the
sole official language for all of Pakistan, while Bangla was spoken by the
majority of people. East Pakistan revolted and several students and civilians
lost their lives on February 21, 1952. The day is revered in Bangladesh and in West Bengal as the
Language Martyrs' Day. Bitter feelings among East Pakistanis never ceased to
grow, especially with repeated arrivals of military rulers. Later, in
remembrance of the 1952 killings, UNESCO declared February 21 as
International Mother Language Day.
Impact of the cyclone:
The already tense situation was further aggravated by a
tropical cyclone that struck East Pakistan in 1970. It was a particularly
devastating year as the deadliest cyclone on record—the Bhola cyclone—struck
Bangladesh claiming nearly half a million lives. The apathy of West Pakistan
leadership and its failure in responding quickly was a further platform for the
Awami League, that capitalized on this tragedy. The Pakistan Army failed to do
relief work of any significance to alleviate the problem, which further
antagonized the already estranged Bengali populace.
Political climax:
The political prelude to the war included several
factors. Due to the differences between the two states, a nascent separatist
movement developed in East Pakistan. Any such movements were sharply limited,
especially when martial law was in force between 1958 and 1962 (under
General Ayub Khan) and between
1969 and 1972 (under General Yahya Khan). These military rulers were of West
Pakistani origin and continued to favor West Pakistan in terms of economic
advantages.
The situation reached a climax when in 1970 the Awami
League, the largest East Pakistani political party, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman,
won a landslide victory in the national elections winning 167 of the 169 seats
allotted for East Pakistan, and a majority of the 313 total seats in the
National Assembly. This gave the Awami League the right to form a government.
However, the leader of Pakistan People's Party, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto,
refused to allow Rahman to become the Prime Minister of Pakistan. Instead, he proposed
a notion of two Prime Ministers. Bhutto also refused to accept Rahman's Six
Points which would result in autonomy for East Pakistan. On March 3, 1971, the
two leaders of the two wings along with the President General Yahya Khan met in
Dhaka to decide the fate of the country. Talks failed. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman
called for a nation-wide strike.
Military preparation in
West Pakistan
General Tikka Khan was flown in to Dhaka to become
Governor of East Bengal. East-Pakistani judges, including Justice Siddique,
refused to swear him in.
MV Swat, a ship of the Pakistani Navy,
carrying ammunition and soldiers, was harbored in Chittagong Port and the
Bengali workers and sailors at the port refused to unload the ship. A unit of
East Pakistan Rifles refused to obey commands to fire on Bengali demonstrators,
beginning a mutiny of Bengali soldiers.
Between March 10 and 13, Pakistan International Airlines
canceled all their international routes to urgently fly "Government
Passengers" to Dhaka. These so-called "Government
Passengers" were almost exclusively Pakistani soldiers in civil uniform.
Bangobondhu's speech of March
7
On March 7, 1971, Bangobondhu (friend of the Bengalis) (Sheikh Mujibur Rahman)
gave a speech at the Racecourse Ground (now called the Suhrawardy Udyan). In
this speech he mentioned a further four-point condition to consider the
National Assembly Meeting on March 25:
- The
immediate lifting of martial law.
- Immediate
withdrawal of all military personnel to their barracks.
- An inquiry
into the loss of life.
- Immediate
transfer of power to the elected representative of the people before the
assembly meeting March 25.
He urged "his people" to turn every house into
a fort of resistance. He closed his speech saying, "The struggle
this time is for our freedom. The struggle this time is for our
independence."
Violence of March 25
On the night of March 25, Pakistan Army began a violent
effort to suppress the Bengali opposition. In Bangladesh, and elsewhere, the
Pakistani actions are referred to as genocide. Before carrying out these acts, all
foreign journalists were systematically deported from Bangladesh. Bengali
members of military services were disarmed. The operation was called Operation
Searchlight by Pakistani Army and was carefully devised by several
top-ranked army generals to "crush" Bengalis.
Although the violence focused on the provincial
capital, Dhaka, the process of ethnic
elimination was also carried out all around Bangladesh. Residential halls of
University of Dhaka were particularly targeted. The only Hindu residential
hall—the Jagannath Hall—was destroyed by the Pakistani armed forces, and an
estimated 600 to 700 of its residents were murdered. The Pakistani army denies
any cold blooded killings at the university, though the Hamood-ur-Rehman
commission in Pakistan states that overwhelming force was used at the
university. This fact and the massacre at Jagannath Hall and nearby student
dormitories of Dhaka University are corroborated by a videotape secretly filmed
by Prof. Nur Ullah of the East Pakistan Engineering University, whose residence
was directly opposite to the student dormitories.
Hindu areas all over Bangladesh suffered particularly
heavy blows. By midnight, Dhaka was literally burning, especially the Hindu
dominated eastern part of the city. Time magazine reported on August 2, 1971,
"The Hindus, who account for three-fourths of the refugees and a majority of the dead, have
borne the brunt of the Muslim military hatred."
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was considered dangerous and,
hence, arrested by Pakistan Army. Awami League was banned by General Yahya
Khan. Some other Awami League leaders were arrested as well, while few escaped
Dhaka to avoid arrest.
Declaration of independence
On March 26, the nation waged an armed struggle against
the Pakistani occupation forces following the killings of the night of 25
March. The Pakistani forces arrested Sheikh Mujib, who, through a wireless
message, had called upon the people to resist the occupation forces
[source: The Daily Star, March 26 2005]. Mujib was arrested on
the night of March 25-26, 1971 at about 1:30 A.M. (per Radio Pakistan’s news on March
29, 1971) which means effectively on March 26, 1971.
On March 26, 1971, M. A. Hannan, an Awami League leader
from Chittagong, is said to have made the first announcement of the declaration
of independence over radio,
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman signed an official declaration on
March 25, 1971 that read:
Today Bangladesh is a sovereign and independent country.
On Thursday night West Pakistani armed forces suddenly attacked the police
barracks at Razarbagh and the EPR headquarters at Pilkhana in Dhaka. Many
innocent and unarmed have been killed in Dhaka city and other places of
Bangladesh. Violent clashes between EPR and Police on the one hand and the
armed forces of Pakistan on the other, are going on. The Bengalis are fighting
the enemy with great courage for an independent Bangladesh. May God aid us in
our fight for freedom. Joy Bangla.[1]
A telegram reached some students in
Chittagong. They realized the message could be broadcast from Agrabad Station
of Radio Pakistan. The message was translated to Bangla by Dr Manjula Anwar.
They failed to secure permission from higher authorities to broadcast the
message. They crossed Kalurghat Bridge into an area controlled by East Bengal
Regiment under Major Ziaur Rahman. Bengali soldiers guarded the station as
engineers prepared for transmission. At 19:45 on March 26, 1971, Major Ziaur
Rahman broadcast another announcement of the declaration of independence on
behalf of Sheikh Mujibur which is as follows.
This is Shadhin Bangla Betar Kendro. I, Major Ziaur
Rahman, at the direction of Bangobondhu Mujibur Rahman, hereby declare that the
independent People's Republic of Bangladesh has been established. At his
direction, I have taken command as the temporary Head of the Republic. In the
name of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, I call upon all Bengalis to rise against the
attack by the West Pakistani Army. We shall fight to the last to free our Motherland.
By the grace of Allah, victory is ours. Joy Bangla.[1]
Kalurghat Radio Station's transmission capability was
limited. The message was picked up by a Japanese ship in Bay of Bengal and then
re-transmitted by Radio Australia and later the British Broadcasting
Corporation.
March 26, 1971 is hence considered the official Independence
Day and according to all Bangladeshi sources, the name Bangladesh was
in effect henceforth. Certain sources, especially of Indian and Pakistani
origin, continued to use the name "East Pakistan" until the following
December 16.
The main war
As political events gathered momentum, the stage was set
for a clash between the Pakistan Army and the insurgents. Though smaller Maoist
style paramilitary bands started emerging, the Mukti Bahini (freedom fighters)
emerged increasingly visible. Headed by Colonel Muhammad Ataul Gani Osmani, a
retired Pakistan Army officer, this band was raised as Mujib's action arm and
security force before assuming the character of a conventional guerrilla force.
After the declaration of Independence, the Pakistan military sought to quell
them, but increasing numbers of Bengali soldiers defected to the underground
"Bangladesh army." These Bengali units slowly merged into the Mukti
Bahini and bolstered their weaponry. They then jointly launched operations
against the Pakistan Army killing many in the process. This setback prompted
the Pakistan Army to induct Razakars, a paramilitary force, from the local
populace to bolster their numbers. These people were essentially viewed as
traitors and with suspicion by local Bengalis, as a vast majority of these
recruits were Bihari Muslims who had settled during the time of partition. This
helped Pakistan stem the tide somewhat as the monsoon approached in the months
of June and July.
Undeterred by this setback, Mukti Bahini regrouped as
they gained in strength and capability. Aided by the Indian government in West
Bengal, they were equipped and trained to counter the Pakistan Army. As there
was no action during the monsoon, it was seen by the Pakistan military brass as
a weakening of the Bangladesh cause. However it was merely the lull before the
storm. After sensing the enormity of the issue, the army was beefed up as the
troop strength was increased to more than 80,000. This caused a rise in
tensions across the border as India realized the gravity of the
situation. The Indian military were preparing for the eventual onslaught with
the aid of the separatists and waited for the end of the monsoon season to
enable easy passage. The Indians aimed to bypass the villages and towns and
instead concentrate on the cities and the highways which ultimately would lead
to the capture of Dhaka.
Pakistan decided to nullify such an attack and on
December 3 and launched a series of preemptive air strikes. The attack was
modeled on the Operation Focus employed by Israel Air Force during the Six-Day War. However
the plan failed to achieve the desired success and was seen as an open act of
unprovoked aggression by the Indians. Indira Gandhi then ordered the immediate
mobilization of troops and launched the full scale invasion. This marked the
official start of the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 with fighting commencing in
West Pakistan. The Indian Army, far superior in numbers and equipment to that
of Pakistan, executed a three-pronged pincer movement on Dhaka launched from the
Indian states of West Bengal, Assam, and Tripura. In all these places the Mukti
Bahini and the local Bengalis played a vital role in aiding the Indian Army.
Many soldiers were ferried in the night by the locals across rivers and
valuable information on the location and whereabouts of different military
strongholds were gleaned. It was backed up by the Indian Air Force which
achieved near air supremacy towards the end of the war as the entire East
Pakistan airbase with all the flights were destroyed. The Indian Navy, also
annihilated the eastern wing of the Pakistan Navy and blockaded the East
Pakistan ports, thereby cutting off any escape routes for the stranded
Pakistani warriors. The fledgling Bangladesh Navy (comprising officers and
sailors who defected from Pakistan Navy) aided the Indians in the marine
warfare, carrying out attacks, most notably Operation Jackpot.
Meanwhile, on the ground, nearly three brigades of Mukti
Bahini along with the Indian forces fought in a conventional formation. This
was supplemented by guerrilla style attacks on Pakistanis who
were facing hostilities on land, air, water in both covert and overt ways.
Undeterred, Pakistan tried to fight back and boost the sagging morale by
incorporating the Special Services Group commandos in sabotage and rescue
missions. This however could not stop the juggernaut of the invading columns
whose speed and power were too much to contain for the Pakistan Army. On December
16, within just 12 days, the capital Dhaka fell to the Mitro Bahini—the
allied forces. Lt. Gen. Niazi surrendered to the combined forces headed by its
commander Lt. Gen. Jagjit Singh Aurora by signing the Instrument of
Surrender at Ramna Racecourse, 16:31 Indian Standard Time. Bangladesh
became liberated.
Formation of the First
Republic
USA and USSR
The United States supported Pakistan both politically and
materially. U.S. President Richard Nixon denied
getting involved in the situation, saying that it was an internal matter of
Pakistan. But when Pakistan's defeat seemed certain, Nixon sent the USS
Enterprise (CVN-65) to the Bay of Bengal and threatened India with a nuclear strike. Enterprise
arrived on station on December 11 1971.
Several documents released from the Nixon Presidential
Archives show the extent of the tilt that the Nixon Administration demonstrated
in favor of Pakistan.[2] Among them, the infamous Blood
telegram from the US embassy in Dacca, East Pakistan, stated the horrors of
genocide taking place in East Pakistan.[3] Notwithstanding this, Nixon, backed
by Henry Kissinger,
wanted to protect the interests of Pakistan as they were apprehensive of India. In fact, even after the war ended USA
wanted to blame India. This propaganda apparently failed in the face of world
opinion.
The Soviet Union had
sympathized with the Bangladeshis, and supported the Indian Army and Mukti
Bahini during the war. It gave assurance to India that if a confrontation with
United States evolved, the USSR would provide all necessary support to India.
The Soviets also sent in a nuclear submarine to ward off the threat posed by
USS Enterprise in the Indian Ocean.
China
After the USA had failed to act decisively in a manner
that would not draw world condemnation to itself, it sought to rope the People's
Republic of China into the conflict. The plan was to attack
India on two sides with the help of China and thus stopping the attack on East
Pakistan. Kissinger's meeting with the Chinese was with this intention. In
fact, China was the only permanent member of the UN Security Council that was
supportive of such an attack, and even provided economic and military
assistance. But the support was limited to protecting West Pakistan in the face
of a threat from India, and not aimed directly at the internal conflict. It was
also suspicious that the U.S. did not want to dirty its hands. The Chinese
government wanted a strongly worded UN Security Council resolution after which
the PRC would help Pakistan. It however did not materialize due to the Soviet
veto and China did not intervene in the war.
United Nations
Though the United Nations condemned
the human rights violations, it failed to defuse the situation politically
before the start of the war. The Security Council assembled on December 4 to
discuss the volatile situation in the South Asia. USSR vetoed the resolution
twice. After lengthy discussions on December 7, the General Assembly promptly
adopted by a majority resolution calling for an "immediate cease-fire and
withdrawal of troops." The United States on December 12 requested that the
Security Council be reconvened. However by the time it was reconvened, and
proposals were finalized, the war ended, making the measures merely academic.
The inaction of the United Nations in face of the East
Pakistan crisis was widely criticized. The conflict also exposed the delay in
decision making that failed to address the underlying issues in time.
India
The majority of the refugees from Bangladesh fled to the Indian state of
West Bengal forcing then Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi to
declare war on West Pakistan. The Pakistan Air Force also attacked many Indian
air fields in hot pursuit of rebels. The Pakistani Army tried to force Indian
troops away from East Pakistan by attacking in the western sectors. Many
battles were fought on the western front which ensured Indian victories. Backed
by the air force and the Navy, India and the Mukti Bahini finally
defeated Pakistan. More than
93,000 Pakistani soldiers and their abettors surrendered to the joined forces
and were taken prisoner of war by the Indian Army, the largest surrender
since World War II.
End of the war
After Pakistan's surrender late in 1971, people in
Bangladesh rejoiced at their liberation. This was followed by the need for
international acceptance for Bangladesh, as only a few countries recognized the
new nation. Bangladesh sought admission into the UN, Most members voting in its favor but China
vetoed recognition, as Pakistan was its key ally. However the United States
grudgingly recognized it. To ensure a smooth transition, in 1972 the Shimla
Agreement was signed between India and Pakistan. The treaty was a
watershed in the history of the South Asian region as it ensured that Bangladesh would be officially recognized
by Pakistan and its principal allies in exchange for the return of the
Pakistani POWs. As a gesture of goodwill, the nearly 200 soldiers who were wanted
for war crimes by Bengalis were also pardoned by India. The accord also gave
back more than 13,000 sq. km of land that Indian troops had won in West
Pakistan during the war, holding on to a few strategic places; most notably
Kargil (which would in turn again be the focal point for a war between the two
nations in 1999). However, the agreement was acknowledged by many observers as
a sign of India's maturity. Some in India felt that the treaty had been too
lenient towards Zulfikar Ali Bhutto,
who had pleaded for more leeway as he felt that the fragile democracy in Pakistan would crumble if the accord was
perceived as being too harsh in Pakistan.
Reaction in West Pakistan
to the war
Reaction to the defeat and dismemberment of half the
nation was a shocking loss to top military and layman alike. No one had
expected that they would lose the formal war in under a fortnight and were also
very angry at the meek surrender of the army in East Pakistan. The myth of the
Pakistan Army's might was shattered and the leadership stood exposed. Yahya Khan's dictatorship collapsed and gave
way to Bhutto who took the opportunity to rise to power. General A. A. K.
Niazi, who surrendered along with 93,000 troops, was viewed with suspicion and
hatred upon his return to Pakistan. He was shunned and branded a
traitor. Pakistan also failed to gather international support and were found
fighting a lone battle with only the USA providing any external help. This
further embittered the Pakistanis who had faced the worst military defeat of an
army in decades.
The debacle immediately prompted an inquiry headed by
Justice Hamdoor Rahman. Called the Hamoodur Rahman Commission, it was initially
suppressed by Zulfikar Ali Bhutto as
it put the military in poor light. When it was declassified, it showed many
failings from the strategic to the tactical levels. It also condemned the
atrocities and the crimes committed by the armed forces. It confirmed the rapes
and the killings by the Pakistan Army and its supporters though the figures are
far lower than the one quoted by Bangladesh. However, the army’s role in
splintering Pakistan after its greatest military debacle was largely ignored by
successive Pakistani governments.
Nomenclature justifications
Three names are frequently used to refer to the exact
same warfare.
Pakistani Civil War
This name is mainly used by current day Pakistan Army and
by certain unofficial Indian sources. The name describes either the period 26
March 1971 to 16 December 1971 or the period March 26, 1971 to December 03,
1971. The main issue arises from the validity of the declaration of
independence on 26 March. This is entirely a matter of political technicality.
There is a certain logic used by proponents of this
nomenclature. According to them no country accepted Bangladesh's independence
declaration and hence the region contemplated continued to be East Pakistan.
So, the war was a civil war in effect.
Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
This name is used by armies of all three countries to
describe the period between December 03, 1971 and December 16, 1971. The Indian
Army does not explicitly use the term to describe the war in their (India's)
Eastern Front at any point. Instead, India only refers to the war on the
Western Front as the Indo-Pakistani War. The Indian Parliament]] recognized the
People's Republic of Bangladesh as an independent country on the December 6,
1971. There is no verifiable definite claim from the Pakistan Army or
Government. Bangladesh clearly uses only the terminology Liberation War of
Bangladesh for the war on Bangladeshi territory.
The proponents of this terminology also question validity
of declaration of independence of Bangladesh since there was no foreign
government that acknowledged the independence. So, according to them, the war
was effectively between Indian Army and Pakistan Army.
Liberation War of
Bangladesh
This terminology is officially used in Bangladesh by all
sources and by Indian official sources. The proponents claim that having won
167 out of 169 seats of East Pakistan, Awami League had people's mandate to
form a democratic government. This gave Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as the leader of
the party the right to declare independence of the country. Since Major Ziaur
Rahman claimed independence on behalf of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, a Bangladesh
government was in existence as early as 26 March 1971. Hence Bangladesh was in
existence. There was also a Bangladesh Army which effectively meant the war was
not between India and Pakistan but between Pakistan and Bangladesh backed by
India.
The terminology is politically preferred by both India
and Bangladesh for a few reasons.
- It gave
India the right to enter the war in support of Bangladesh without
breaching United Nations laws that prevent countries from interfering with
other countries' internal affairs.
- Members of
East Pakistan Regiment were able to fight Pakistan Army without being
treated as mutineers since they were fighting under command of a
Bangladeshi Government.
- It made it
easier for Indian diplomatic efforts to gain support for the recognition
of Bangladesh as a country.
Atrocities
The Bangladesh liberation war witnessed widespread
atrocities committed mainly on the Bengali population of East Pakistan, at a
level that Bangladeshis maintain is one of the worst genocides in history. The actual extent
of the atrocities committed is not clearly known, and opinions vary, as the
next section discusses. However, there is little doubt that numerous civilians
were tortured and killed during the war. There are many mass graves in
Bangladesh, and newer ones are always being discovered, such as a recent one in
a mosque in Dhaka located in the
non-Bengali region of the city. The first night of war on Bengalis, which is
very well documented, saw indiscriminate killings of students of Dhaka
University and other civilians.
How many people died?
The number of people that died in the liberation war of
Bangladesh is not known in any reliable accuracy. There has been a great
disparity in the casualty figures put forth by Pakistan on one hand (26,000)
and India and Bangladesh on the other hand (3 million). International media has
also had different views.[4] Due to the lack of records and the
long time that has since passed, an accurate number is hard to get, though
various arguments for and against certain numbers have been put forward. Most
guesses fall somewhere between a few hundred thousand and two million.
Pakistan has maintained that only 26,000 people died in
the war. Though most researchers do not support such a small number, many are
inclined to believe that the real number was still a far cry from the 3 million
put forward by Bangladesh and other sources. Some maintain that the real number
of casualties was closer to 300,000 and was wrongly translated.[5]
On the other hand, though the figure of 3 million is
unsubstantiated, many believe that the real number is still exceedingly high
(more than 1 million) and the killing can clearly be termed a genocide. This view gets support from the
aforementioned reports in international media, which were reported during the
war before the 3 million figure was put forward. Supporters of this view would
also point out to the enormous influx of refugees into India (8 million seems to be a widely
accepted number), and reason that killings numbering as low as the Pakistanis
would like to claim would not have caused such a large number of people to
leave their homes. Some say that the Bangladesh claim might have had roots in a
statement by Yahya Khan. According to Robert Payne in Massacre [1973],
on February 22, 1971 Yahya Khan told a group of generals, "Kill three
million of them, and the rest will eat out of our hands."
Atrocities on women and
minorities
Numerous women were tortured, raped and killed during the war. Again,
exact numbers are not known and are a subject of debate. Bangladeshi sources
cite a staggering figure of 200,000 women raped. Some other sources, for
example Susan Brownmiller, refer to an even higher number of 400,000. Pakistani
sources claim the number is much lower, though having not completely denied
rape incidents.
There has been evidence of not only rape (and usually
subsequent murder) of women, but of sex slaves kept captive by the Pakistan
army. During the last periods of war, when the Pakistani army was retreating,
the Mukti Bahini and Indian forces reported freeing numerous such women. Apart
from Brownmiller's, another work that has included direct experiences from the
women raped is Ami Virangana Bolchhi ("I, the heroine,
speak") by Nilima Ibrahim. The work includes in its name from the
word Virangana (Heroine), given by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman after
the war, to the raped and tortured women during the war. This was a conscious
effort to alleviate any social stigma the women might face in the society. How
successful this effort was is doubtful, though.
The minorities of Bangladesh, specially the Hindus, were the biggest targets of the
Pakistan army. There was widespread killing of Hindu males, and rapes of women.
In public places, men were often made to undress to prove that they have been
circumcised and hence were Muslim. More than 60 percent of the Bengali refugees
that had fled to India were Hindus, and many never returned. It is not exactly
known what percentage of the people killed by the Pakistan army were Hindus, but it is safe
to say it was disproportionately high. This widespread violence against Hindus
was motivated by a policy to purge East Pakistan of what was seen as Indian
influence. The West Pakistani rulers identified the Bengali culture with Hindu
and Indian culture, and thought that the eradication of Hindus would remove
such influences from the majority Muslims in East Pakistan.
Killing of intellectuals
The Pakistani ruling class had long formed a distaste for
Bengali intelligista and students. They viewed them, correctly, as one of the
main proponents of the rise of Bengali nationalism in East Pakistan. This group
had been instrumental in the 1952 uprising called the Language movement, which
ended in Pakistan accepting Bangla as one of its national languages. The famed
six-point demand put forward by Mujib, which became the rallying point for
Awami League in the years before the war, was derived from the earlier 11-point
program penned by the students. In an attempt to undermine the rising Bengali
identity, Pakistan had variously tried to have Bangla written in roman letters,
ban singing the songs of Rabindranath Tagore,
mostly in vain. The rulers, again correctly, also found a growing leftist
sentiment in the intelligista and student bodies which they vowed to crush.
Hence during the war, a planned effort was made to void Bangladesh of its most
enlightened people. In addition to the killings committed at the beginning and
all throughout the war, a meticulously planned execution was carried out on
December 14, 1971. Professors, journalists, doctors, artists, writers of
unknown numbers were rounded up in Dhaka, blindfolded, taken to Rajarbag in the
middle section of the city, and executed en masse. This day is now honored in
Bangladesh as Buddhijibi Hotta Dibosh ("Day of Martyred
Intellectuals").
Recipients of Military
Awards
Four categories of gallantry awards were created after
the war in Bangladesh to honor those who had demonstrated outstanding bravery
in the war. These were: Bir Sreshţho, Bir Uttom, Bir Bikrôm, and Bir Protik.
Seven soldiers were awarded the ultimate award for gallantry, Bir Sreshţho. All
seven had given their lives in the war. They were:
- Amin,
Ruhul
- Jahangir,
Mohiuddin (Captain)
- Kamal,
Mostafa (Sepoy)
- Rahman,
Hamidur (Sepoy)
- Rahman,
Matiur (Flight Lieutenant)
- Rouf,
Munshi Abdur (Naik)
- Sheikh,
Nur Mohammad (Lance Naik)
Current day influence of
the War
Naturally, the liberation war on 1971 has been a source
of inspiration for a wide body of artistic work in Bangladesh, as well as some
work by international artists. Follows a incomplete list of some of the major
works done on the war:
- Films
·
Stop Genocide – documentary by Zahir Raihan, (1971)
·
Nine Months to Freedom: The Story of Bangladesh – documentary by S.
Sukhdev (1972)
·
Shei Rater Kotha Bolte Eshechi ("Tale of the
Darkest Night") – documentary by Kawsar Chowdhury, (2001).
·
Muktir Gaan, Muktir Katha and Narir
Katha – three different Bangla documentaries by Tareque Masud and
Catherine Masud
·
Border – a movie on the India Pakistan side
of the war.
·
Aguner Parashmani – feature film by Humayun Ahmed
·
Shyamal Chhaya – feature film by Humayun Ahmed
·
Ekattorer Jishu – feature film by Nasiruddin Yusuf
- Bangla
literature and memoirs
·
Ami Virangana Balchhi – memoir by Nilima Ibrahim
·
Ekattorer Dinguli – memoir by Jahanara Imam
·
Ma – novel by Anisul Haque
·
Jochhna o Janani'r Galpo – novel by Humayun
Ahmed
- International
arts and media
·
Concert
for Bangladesh, New York, (1971)
·
September
on Jessore Road – a long poem by Allen Ginsberg[6]
·
Joan
Baez: Song of Bangladesh. (Song)[7]
·
George
Harrison: Bangla Desh. (Song)
- Sculptures
and monuments
·
Smritishoudho
– national "memory monument" in Savar, Dhaka
·
Aporajito
Bangla – sculpture in Dhaka University
·
Shabash
Bangladesh – sculpture in Rajshahi University
·
Shoparjito
Shadhinota – sculpture in Dhaka University
- Museums
·
Liberation
war museum, Dhaka
·
Shahid
Smriti Sangrohoshala (Martyr memorial museum), Rajshahi
Notes
- History,
The Declaration of Independence Virtual Bangladesh.
- Sajit
Gandhi (ed.), The Tilt: The U.S. and the South Asian Crisis of
1971 National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book
No. 79 (December 16, 2002). Retrieved August 30, 2012.
- Telegram U.S. Department of State.
Retrieved August 30, 2012.
- History:
The Birth of Bangladesh, The Bangali Holocaust. Virtual Bangladesh.
- Bangladesh Islamist leader Ghulam Azam charged BBC
News (May 13, 2012). Retrieved August 30, 2012.
- September on Jessore Road Allen
Ginsberg (November 14-16, 1971). Retrieved August 30, 2012.
- Song of
Bangladesh Chandos Music (ASCAP), 1972. Joan Baez website.
References
- Ayoob,
Mohammed and Subrahmanyam, K. The Liberation War. New
Delhi: S. Chand, 1972.
- Bhargava,
G.S. Crush India-Gen. Yahya Khan; or, Pakistan's Death Wish. Delhi:
Indian School Supply Depot, Publication Division, 1972. ASIN B005J0TO12
- Bhattacharyya,
S. K. Genocide in East Pakistan/Bangladesh: A Horror Story. Houston,
TX: A. Ghosh, 1988. ISBN 0961161434
- Brownmiller,
Susan. Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York:
Fawcett Columbine, 1993. ISBN 0449908208
- Choudhury,
G.W. The Last Days of United Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford
University Press, 1993. ISBN 0195774671
- Kanjilal,
Kalidas. The Perishing Humanity. Calcutta: Sahitya Loke,
1976.
- Malik,
Amita. The Year of the Vulture. New Delhi: Orient
Longman, 1972.
- Mascarenhas,
Anthony. The Rape of Bangla Desh. Delhi: Vikas
Publications, 1971. ASIN B0006E1A0O
- Matinuddin,
Kamal. Tragedy of Errors: East Pakistan Crisis, 1968-1971. Lahore,
Pakistan: Wajidalis, 1994. ISBN 9698031197
- Payne,
Robert. Massacre, The Tragedy of Bangladesh and the Phenomenon of
Mass Slaughter Throughout History. NY: Macmillan, 1973. ISBN 978-0025952409
- Quereshi,
Hakeem Arshad. The 1971 Indo-Pak War : A Soldiers Narrative. Karachi:
Oxford University Press, 2002. ISBN 0195797787
- Salik,
Siddiq. Witness to Surrender. Karachi: Oxford University
Press, 1977. ISBN 978-0195777611
- Sisson,
Richard and Rose, Leo. War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the
Creation of Bangladesh. Berkeley : University of California
Press, 1992. ISBN 0520062809
- Totten,
Samuel et al. eds. Century of Genocide: Eyewitness Accounts and
Critical Views. New York: Garland Pub, 1997. ISBN 0815323530
- Zaheer,
Hasan. The Separation of East Pakistan: The Rise and Realization
of Bengali Muslim Nationalism. Karachi; NY: Oxford University
Press, 1994. ISBN 0195774922
External links
All links retrieved December 31, 2021.
- Bangladesh History: Independence Virtual
Bangladesh
- Case Study: Genocide in Bangladesh, 1971 Gendercide.org
- The Tilt: The U.S. and the South Asian Crisis of
1971
- The complete Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report
…
Copied from: https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Bangladesh_War_of_Independence
Copyright: I don’t reserve copyright of this write up.
Writing credit: New World Encyclopedia https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/
…
Like, share & comment: https://www.facebook.com/zafaritelevision.nmkzafari
Subscribe my channel: https://www.youtube.com/@zafaritv1199/
Like
my other social networks:-
Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/NMKZAFARI.PMP.CPMS
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/Zafari_PMP_CPMS
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nmkzafari-pmp-cpms/
Blog:
https://nurulmostafakamalzafari.blogspot.com/
Instagram:
https://www.instagram.com/nmkzafari_pmp_cpms/
Comments
Post a Comment